王冠第四季

这三集的主场人物分别是戴安娜王妃，玛格丽特公主和撒切尔夫人。

女王戏份大幅缩减。

第六集 Terra Nullius 无主之地1983年3月5日，澳洲工党以压倒优势大败自由党，鲍勃·霍克(Robert Hawke，1929-2019)成功当选澳大利亚总理，接连执政至1991年。

Bob Hawke片名无主之地(Terra Nullius)指的是早先对澳大利亚的称呼。

无主之地的称呼同年，查尔斯王子与戴安娜王妃出访澳大利亚和新西兰，受到了当地人民的热烈欢迎，民众们尤其是对戴安娜十分热爱。

1982年6月21日，戴安娜诞下威廉王子。

1984年9月15日，戴安娜诞下哈利王子。

查尔斯王子与戴安娜王妃在戴妃的坚持下，几个月大的威廉王子也一同随行，这也算是开创了一项传统，现在凯特王妃有时出访也是带着孩子。

剧作十分还原了1954年，女王出访，是直接把孩子留在家里半年。

女王和菲利普1996年戴安娜在与查尔斯分居后受访时说，她曾因受不住作为王室成员压力患上暴食症(bulimia)，有时候一天要吃四、五餐，每次都吃到胀然后呕吐。

1995年戴妃惊爆世人眼球的访谈！

_哔哩哔哩 (゜-゜)つロ 干杯-bilibili据她的采访，她认为王室成员是不知情的。

在剧情中，这已经传到了众人的耳中。

三个八卦小能手在飞机上，戴安娜和助理的争吵，看得我觉得两方都很有理说得都很对。

正如戴安娜所说，在没有温暖的家庭长大的孩子怎么会有人性。

戴安娜或许不是常规的王室成员，但绝对是个好母亲这个旅途中，戴安娜终于和查尔斯甜蜜了片刻，在当民众的热情主要集中在戴安娜身上时，两人关系又开始恶化，快乐就像是偷来的，太过短暂。

跳舞的两口子戴安娜前去见女王，临走前给了一个熊抱。

不得不说，感情缺失的女王真得很适合高位，可也正是因为她没有给到查尔斯足够的爱，查尔斯才会缺乏安全感。

小戴直接抱了女王戴安娜和查尔斯都是在原生家庭中缺乏温暖，双方中没有一人可以强大到来引导对方。

成熟潇洒的卡米拉和需要认可的查尔斯的确更般配。

被惊到的女王菲利普，玛格丽特公主，曾是这个家庭最有“人味”最强调自我与个性的成员，但他们放弃这些后，他们才真正融进这个环境；而就像一家子女性成员在餐桌上讲的，如果戴安娜不能屈服(bend)便会破碎(break)。

王室认为戴安娜现在还不成熟，但终会不再反抗第七集 The Hereditary Principle 世袭原则每一季都会有一集聚焦在玛格丽特公主(1930-2002)身上，这一集讲述玛格丽特在看心理医生的过程中发现了家庭内的一个丑闻。

玛格丽特公主海伦娜·伯翰·卡特(Helena Bonham Carter)饰演公主，发现这个家庭秘密去找她母亲王太后伊丽莎白质询，而她在2010年电影《国王的演讲》中同样扮演过伊丽莎白这个角色。

HBC在国王的演讲中的扮相她母亲那一系，有家庭成员有着精神疾病(mental illness)，因爱八退位后，鲍思-里昂家族(Bowes-Lyon)，本是一个minor苏格兰贵族，一下子成了和王室有直接联系的贵族，为了维护王室颜面，其有疾病的成员被隐藏了起来。

鲍思里昂家族两位被隐藏的女性而她父亲这一支，本就是有着精神疾病的基因，乔治三世（参考电影：《疯狂的乔治王》），约翰王子（参考电影：《失落的王子》），即乔治六世的弟弟。

乔治五世的家庭现在整个欧洲王室的祖奶奶维多利亚女王本身就是血友病患者，在她嫁给自己的德国表哥Albert后生了9个孩子，四处和王室联姻，把这个“传女不传男”的疾病基因四处散播了出去。

维多利亚女王的子嗣第八集 48:1此集讲述女王和撒切尔对南非种族隔离持有不同态度而产生的分歧。

这两位的对话是一大看点1985年，48个英联邦国家打算对南非的种族隔离政策进行制裁，而唯独撒切尔持反对意见，正是片名48:1。

女王希望能制裁种族隔离剧中的剧情是，女王与其他联邦领袖持相同意见为此和撒切尔而产生分歧，当这份不满见报后，引来许多违宪的批判。

王室持续坚称当否认无法服众后，只好以白金汉宫发言人Michael Shae为替罪羊。

Michael Shae对于南非这段历史，可以看下南非脱口秀演员及今日秀主持人Trevor Noah的很多脱口秀节目以及他的自传《Born a crime/天生有罪》。

南非的种族隔离（Apartheid）以四种人为分类：白人、有色人种、印度人与黑人。

日本人被视为与白人同等级，而当时在南非的中国人被视为与黑人一个等级。

早在1927年当局就有禁止欧洲裔和当地人通婚的条例《Immorality Act》。

崔娃南非在历史上曾为英国殖民地。

1961年5月改名为南非共和国。

在白人统治时期长期在国内以立法和行政手段推行种族歧视和种族隔离政策。

1994年4月27日举行了首次不分种族的大选，产生了制宪议会和新政府，曼德拉出任南非首任黑人总统，同年终止了种族隔离制度。

曼德拉1986年，约克公爵安德鲁王子(1960-)与莎拉·佛格森结婚，后于1996年离婚。

两人育有两女，Beatrice和Eugenie。

婚礼当日，安德鲁还被查尔斯讽刺为王室的边缘(fringe)成员。

三人表情满分《王冠》第二季影评：《王冠》背后，分集剧情介绍《王冠》第三季影评：《王冠》第三季分集个人笔记《王冠》第四季影评：《王冠》第四季分集简介-第1-2集《王冠》第四季分集简介-第3集世纪婚礼《王冠》第四季分集简介-第4-5集马岛战争《王冠》第四季分集简介-第9-10集《王冠》第五季预测：《王冠》第五季剧情预测同类影视推荐：不列颠历代英国君主影视作品

一开始的时候，我是带着十分兴奋的心情看这部剧的，毕竟我对英国80年代的流行文化和历史很感兴趣。

尤其是戴安娜王妃和撒切尔夫人的登场，让我对这部剧更加抱有期待。

这一个星期断断续续看下来之后，觉得确实还原了英国那个激荡的80年代。

尤其是对英国80年代流行音乐的运用，使得全剧处处都是第二波英伦入侵的影子。

像戴妃最爱的Duran Duran，Ultravox以及Queen等歌手的名曲，都有出现，这对于我这个New Wave的忠实听众来说是个惊喜。

但是当我把这部剧与历史的史实以及英国的现状结合起来的时候，我的观剧感受似乎带上了一层沉重的气氛。

因为我知道，这部剧虽然其中含有众多虚构的成分，但是它纪录的是曾经的历史。

而曾经的历史又直接影响了如今的故事。

所以当我看到《王冠》当中有些情节的时候，总会不由得联想到现在。

第一集，以伊丽莎白二世骑马向白金汉宫外的人们致意为开头，以蒙巴顿公爵的葬礼为结束。

可共和主义者对于英国政府的控诉，却贯穿着这一头一尾。

这声声控诉把北爱尔兰的伤痕一开始便展露在我们的眼前，告诉我们这片土地承受了多少的哀愁和痛楚。

之后的剧情虽然没有重点着墨于北爱局势，但是频现于电视报道中的示威，恐袭，还是告诉我们80年代的北爱尔兰依然动荡。

而撒切尔夫人在蒙巴顿公爵去世后向女王立下的誓言，则告诉我们她与IRA之间即将展开血腥的战争。

后来在80年代发生的绝食抗议和布莱顿爆炸案，也印证了铁娘子的决心有多坚定。

如今，北爱政府继20年前的吉尔莫四人组后，又逮捕了一位涉嫌参与1974年伯明翰爆炸的嫌犯。

而英国脱欧后可能留下的硬边界，则似乎是折磨英国的‘癌症’复发的征兆。

第五集‘费根’告诉了我们，撒切尔夫人削减福利，打击工会的政策给英国带来的影响有多沉重。

这一集讲述了迈克尔费根闯入白金汉宫并于女王谈话的历史事件，同时也描写了伦敦的失业者们落魄贫困的景象，以及当时恶劣的社会环境。

多次求职无果的费根走投无路，只能用特殊的方式‘上访’，让女王听到民意。

那段女王与费根的谈话，让我联想到如今英国社会由于疫情失去工作的老百姓们。

他们其中可能在80年代，作为20出头的年轻人，就已经忍受着贫困的屈辱。

正如Wham那首Wham Rap当中唱的，‘...I may not have a job, But I have a good time...’，尽可能的用酒精和音乐麻痹自我。

20多年过去了，私有化的遗毒依然存在，失业人群依然居高不下。

政治家们把他们失业的罪过推脱给移民和少数族裔，于是人们选择了脱欧，选择了排外，继而出现了疾风一代丑闻（Windrush Scandal，少数族裔被剥夺工作资格的事件），然后少数族裔又反过来用BLM回击着...如果撒切尔夫人还在世，看到如今的英国社会非但没有复兴，反而愈加分裂和衰败时，不知她会作何感想。

而女王这样的上层阶级，真的能听到百姓的心声吗？

她又能做出多少改变呢？

而全剧最大的看点，也就是查尔斯与戴安娜的婚姻，则最让我感到唏嘘。

在我看来，卡米拉，查尔斯和戴安娜的情感纠葛不仅是他们个人的痛苦，也是王室的痛苦。

当看到菲利普亲王对戴安娜说出我们都是‘局外人’时，我能感受到王室婚姻的巨大悲哀。

其中的每一个人都在为维持着君主立宪制度的存活而被折磨几乎筋疲力尽，每个人都在逢场作戏，每个人都背负着沉重的枷锁。

而如今看看哈利与梅根的公然背叛，看看安德鲁王子丑闻爆发时的窘迫，你会明白伊丽莎白二世如今的心境，其实和撒切尔夫人离开唐宁街的心境是如出一辙的，那就是‘哀莫大于心死’。

而尽管女王无可争议地贯彻了当年一声‘我将为这个国家奉献一生’的誓言，但是当人们开始怀疑‘We will meet again’时，当人们走上街头抗议防疫措施时，女王的心情该会有多无奈。

女王已经尽力了，可是百姓已经不再相信童话了。

《王冠》将会拍到第六季，也就是2000年代作为全系列的结尾，但是我们已经知道这个系列的真正结局是什么样了。

‘查尔斯和卡米拉进入白金汉宫后，外面围着一圈圈的抗议人群...’毫无疑问这不是一个美好的结局。

可残忍的是，这或许是一个必将发生的结局。

那一轮太阳，终将在黑夜中若隐若现一阵后，再也不见其踪影。

第九集 Avalanche 雪崩1985年，查尔斯37周岁生日，戴安娜在歌剧院献舞，查尔斯为此大动肝火。

我还以为是王室比较保守王妃当众演出不妥，没想到是因为查尔斯觉得她又在抢风头。

小戴美翻了此时的音乐是Billy Joel的《Uptown Girl》，被女王问谁是Billy Jo El，看着一段笑死，像不像你的长辈紧跟流行。

Billy Joel，是一位美国歌手，于1949年出生，首张专辑是《Piano Man》，发表于1973年。

《Uptown Girl》MV1988年3月，查尔斯遭遇雪崩。

此时戴安娜也开始私会他人，但经历了这次雪崩事件后，她想再一次为婚姻作出努力。

戴妃送的录影带她送给查尔斯的结婚周年礼物是自己录的一首歌，出自《歌剧魅影》，而这也正是演员Emma Corrin的试戏片段之一。

善意换来了佯装的善意和背后的讽刺查尔斯抱怨到面对所谓的善意还要装好人可太累了，安妮上演了人间清醒。

查尔斯反而怒了第十集 War 战争1900年，撒切尔被同僚背后捅刀子，结束了长达11年的执政生涯。

杰弗瑞直接发起批评在她的第一任期中，1982年，撒切尔夫人就hk会见DXP，但没有出现在剧集中。

撒切尔夫人曾想在1997年以后让英国人在HK的行政管理中继续发挥作用，譬如保留一名英国总督，该建议被中方拒绝。

最后撒切尔迫于形势不得不做出让步。

“1984年-1985年的英国矿工罢工”也没有出现在剧情中，每季顶多一集从普通人的视角出发，而这季只给了Fagan那集（S4E05）上。

英国矿工罢工是一个影响英国煤炭业的重大产业行动，罢工的失败极大削弱了英国工会，也被看成是撒切尔政府和保守党的在political及意识形态上的一场重大胜利。

撒切尔夫人在1990年11月辞任首相后不久，即被女王伊丽莎白二世颁赠地位崇高的功绩勋章。

她的丈夫丹尼撒切尔，则在1991年获册封为从男爵，以确保儿子马克·撒切尔有头衔可以继承。

而这也是自1965年以来，唯一册立的从男爵爵位。

撒切尔一家2005年10月13日，撒切尔夫人80岁大寿，伊丽莎白女王、首相托尼·布莱尔、前首相约翰·梅杰等贵宾均应邀出席。

女王，里根和撒切尔曾在其执政末期背叛她的亚伯拉昂的杰弗里·豪勋爵也获得她的宽恕，并在席间发表演讲高度赞美。

杰弗里·豪勋爵这一部主要聚焦在家事的拉扯上。

看女王日常让我想到了《甄嬛传》里甄嬛教儿子弘历的两句话，“喜怒不形于色”，“心事勿让人知”。

想和女王谈心太难了，女王对于情感外露婆婆妈妈真是零容忍，上一季对查尔斯的威尔士演讲就有所展现。

这一季情愿去喂狗也不愿和儿媳谈话，和儿子讲话还要让对方站起来以求快速结束。

女王slay女王对查尔斯，菲利普对戴安娜，这两场对话格外精彩。

这一季的菲利普格外体贴戴安娜表示自己不被接纳不被认可一直是个外人，菲利普说这个系统内每人都是外人，除了女王。

Everyone in this system is a lost, lonely, irrelevant soul, apart from the one person, the only person that matters. She is the oxygen we all breathe, the essence of all our duty. ——Philip最后的画面是一家子人过圣诞，小戴摆出了“钮祜禄”要开大的表情。。

季终《王冠》第二季影评：《王冠》背后，第二季分集简介《王冠》第三季影评：《王冠》第三季分集个人笔记《王冠》第四季影评：《王冠》第四季分集简介-第1-2集《王冠》第四季分集简介-第3集世纪婚礼《王冠》第四季分集简介-第4-5集马岛战争《王冠》第四季分集简介-第6-8集《王冠》第五季预测：《王冠》第五季剧情预测同类影视推荐：不列颠历代英国君主影视作品

为啥说王冠毁了戴安娜，戴安娜却救了王冠？

一、网飞大剧《王冠》演到第四季，越来越明确地表达了一个观点：王冠吃人。

这季里就生吞了戴安娜。

戴安娜，一个20岁的青涩少女，只身嫁入皇宫。

她的故事里有王子、公主，有走过长街的“玻璃”马车，有长达八米的婚纱，有梦幻一般的婚礼。

这简直就是童话！

以至于剧中戴安娜的好友都羡慕地说，你到皇宫以后，一定要给我们打电话啊，在那儿，你的水杯上是不是都会画着一顶小王冠？

但几乎是一走入皇宫，戴安娜就被打入了冷宫。

她见不到她自己的丈夫查尔斯，打电话给王子，永远都是“查尔斯现在不在，不过我会把你打来电话的消息转告给王子的”，然后就没有回音了。

王子忙着和卡米拉厮守。

她打电话给女王，得到的消息也是“女王现在不方便”。

她见不到女王。

是啊，女王是没有必要见她的。

女王需要她做的就是一个恭敬守礼的威尔士王妃，最好是静默而得体的木偶。

剧中，当戴安娜拥抱女王时，女王懵得连双手都不知该放在何处，事后，女王说这真是“令人厌恶的拥抱”。

孤独、无助、绝望，戴安娜换上了进食障碍和抑郁症。

查尔斯将戴安娜精神状态不佳的消息四处宣扬，就差像《雷雨》里的周朴园一样逼老婆繁漪喝药了。

王冠的残酷还在于，不论查尔斯做了什么，即便和戴安娜离婚，他仍是王子。

可戴安娜若是离婚的话，将一无所有。

二、可是，我们不会再记得被打入冷宫的那些皇帝昔日的宠妃，却会一直记得查尔斯不爱的戴安娜，因为戴安娜走向了公众。

英国首相布莱尔说戴安娜是“人民的王妃”，恰如其分。

童话里的公主，眼里只有王子。

那当我们真的见到这样一位公主时，她会怎么对待我们这些普通人呢？

戴安娜的回答是，我就和每个普通人一样。

她内心里并不觉得自己是高高在上的王室成员，她首先觉得自己是一位妻子，一位母亲，一个活生生的人。

戴安娜也喜欢逛街，喜欢流行音乐，甚至会带孩子去吃肯德基。

于是，戴安娜在见到百姓时，会与她们握手、拥抱，细心地一束又一束地接过她们手中的鲜花，见到小孩子时一定要俯下身子……也许会有人觉得，就是这些逢场作戏式的亲民举动，谁都会做，只是她们不屑于如此去做罢了。

他们大错特错了。

当你做这些举动时，不论是身处其间的人，还是电视镜头，都会捕捉到你的动作、神态、心情，以及背后所隐藏的你的真意。

因而，我们才会更讨厌做作，甚于冷漠。

因为那些逢场作戏是一种欺骗，也是对我们每个人所抱有的真心的践踏。

戴安娜不是亲民，她就是普通人中的一员。

所以，同样需要时常与公众打交道的首相布莱尔都会在回忆录里说，“我知道，她向残疾人和病人们伸出援手的方式，透着真挚，没有人能够模仿，也没有其他与她地位相当的人做过这样的事。

她当然了解那样做的结果，然而，如果没有真诚的感情，效果是不可能如此显著的。

”三、戴安娜身处冰原之上，陷于无助之中。

于是，她当然愿意去认识、了解那些同处无助之境的人们，如果可以的话，她也愿意尽自己的绵薄之力，与这些人们报团取暖。

从这个意义上说，戴安娜不是投身于慈善，而是重新定义了慈善。

慈善不只是捐款捐物，更是感同身受。

戴安娜去见残疾人，病人，深入美国充满混乱和犯罪的街区，深入随时有爆炸危险的雷区。

、在那个人们认为一碰患者就会感染艾滋病的年代，戴安娜与罹患艾滋病的儿童不带着手套直接握手，而且拥抱了患儿。

与她一道前来的美国总统夫人布什都留下了眼泪。

就像迈克尔杰克逊说的，戴安娜的为人真的很好，热心肠，又有同情心，很真实的，她不会为了公关宣传造假，她是真的非常有爱心。

戴安娜的这些举动改变了人们的王室的固有看法，拯救了王冠。

步入近代的英国，削夺了王权，保留了王位。

一个问题接踵而来，就是既然国王不再握有实权，我们为什么还要花钱养着你们？

二战后的伊丽莎白女王，竭力都是扮演超然的领袖与不会犯错的道德楷模。

因而，王室越少出现，越安全。

但在一个日益平民化的社会里，人们更愿意看到更完美的自己，而不是高高在上的他人。

戴安娜成功地将王室的政治身份转化为社会影响力，这种影响力与党派无关，却像阳光一样照亮漆黑，像春风一般抚慰人心。

人们看到了王室所能拥有的道德力量，不是在私德领域的纯白无瑕，而是在公益上的奋不顾身。

剧中，卡米拉说，戴安娜童话的锻造是由于主人公备受委屈。

她只说对了一半，戴安娜在王冠下的委屈，确实引发人的怜悯，但她将个人的委屈化为让他人舒展的努力，才真实地获得了人的钦佩。

所以，戴安娜离婚后，王室为她保留了威尔士王妃的头衔。

但是，我们更愿意称呼她——戴安娜王妃。

先捋捋这一季的卡司。

跟第三季一样，二代女王扮演者奥利维亚·科尔曼（她在NT的佳作《蚊子》看了没），菲利普亲王托比亚斯·门基斯（此前主演了阿尔梅达剧院的《狩猎》），撒切尔夫人的扮演者吉莲·安德森（她的《欲望号街车》是NT Live中的经典之作，《彗星美人》也不错），饰演安德鲁王子的Tom Byrne则出演了RSC版本的《第十二夜》，撒切尔的儿子是不是也是相当眼熟的纨绔子弟？

扮演者弗莱迪·福克斯在王尔德的《理想丈夫》里也是这么一个被宠坏的角色……对不起打住，我们还是不要把“英国演员只有二十人”这个话题继续下去了。

按照编剧彼得·摩根的设定，《王冠》根据首相的任期分季，第4季的时间跨度刚好是1979年至1990年撒切尔夫人任内，观众则对此带着格外“不怀好意”的期待：把当代最著名的家庭——英国王室——戏剧化无疑是一个艰巨的任务，但它最大的困难或许不在于题材的敏感性，而在于随着剧中年代的推进，《王冠》愈发在讲述当下，每个观众都是身处其中的旁观者。

过于忠实地书写会使人丧失新鲜感，但如果闻所未闻又会使叙事显得可疑，结果似乎不是王室人设翻车，就是《王冠》口碑翻车。

这一季，一票人是冲着查尔斯和戴安娜的世纪婚礼和婚姻悲剧来的，另一票大概是冲着传闻格外不和的女王和首相撒切尔之间的对手戏来的，结果彼得·摩根算是经受了考验，观众两两各得其所。

连结他们的是以代际为名的观念冲突：虽然剧中人的生活年代慢慢赶上了我们今天的世界，但王室仍在固执地抵御着现代化。

上几季我们还在同情女王和菲利普亲王受到古老制度与刻板礼仪的约束，这一季他们正努力将之强加给自己的子女与臣民。

不过观众很快会意识到，戴安娜也好，撒切尔夫人也好，在某种程度上她们和《王冠》系列中第一次聚焦的普通人——两度绕过守卫闯入白金汉宫的迈克尔·费根（Michael Fagan）一样，是王室的陌生人、权力阶层的外来户，他们可能并未真正进入过这个固执己见的王室及其拥趸圈子，但却狠狠地冲击了它。

他们与王室的冲突，在不同层面折射着旧制度荫蔽（甚至制造）的暗角。

不谙世事的戴安娜在嫁入王宫之后需要忍受查尔斯王子的出轨，需要忍受婆婆的视而不见，这场婚姻的悲剧暴露出维护王室体面背后的自私冷酷，甚至也展现出人们在集体维护君主政体的幻觉时，所忽略的个体的代价和牺牲；而出身中产的撒切尔夫人，即便手握大权，也始终被高傲的上流阶层摒弃于外，她为英国社会与经济下的猛药不曾得到过王室的认可，但另一方面，王室也并没有对饱受冲击的底层施以援手——正如失业工人迈克尔·费根闯进女王卧室所说：“我就是想来告诉你外边发生的事，你要么不知道，要么不在乎”，君主制中“无为而治”的角色背后，有一种惊人的无知和冷漠。

这一季仍对讲述重大历史事件保持了克制，细节倒是十分生动，角度亦十分巧妙。

比如以撒切尔夫人的儿子在拉力赛中失踪一事为切口，来展现忙于公务的强势母亲们和她们的问题孩子们。

这边“铁娘子”撒切尔夫人对胡闹的儿子关爱有加又无限纵容，那厢引起女王对自己长期“失职”的自省，突发奇想要去了解和亲近自己早已成年的孩子们。

父亲口中“始终不在状态”的查尔斯，后来在他举世瞩目的婚姻中，活体演绎了不愿意在王权与自由、妻子与情人之间做任何选择题的贪婪巨婴：“我尽了全力，但我在忍受煎熬。

”而编剧给女王的台词太令人拍案叫绝了： “不，忍受煎熬的不是你，我们才是忍受煎熬。

旁人看到你和戴安娜，只看到两个环境优渥的年轻人，因为生来的好运气，得到了梦寐以求的生活。

没有任何一个人，会觉得你们是在受苦。

他们知道你背叛妻子，也毫无隐瞒之意；知道拜你所赐，她的精神出了毛病，现在是暴食还是厌食，我都搞不清楚；也知道你是一个被宠坏的幼稚男人，一天到晚在无病呻吟，娶了一个被宠坏的幼稚女人，一天到晚在无病呻吟。

我们都彻底厌倦了！

大家只想你们好好振作，别再让自己出糗，好好经营你们的婚姻，过好你们幸运至极的人生。

” 反正两个女人就算不和，在养儿子这个问题上她们倒是有相同的失败。

当然，任何对于细节的描写总会引来对“戏说历史”的质疑，这次是文化大臣道登直接喊话Netflix应该给《王冠》显著标明“本片纯属虚构”，就……别忘了它可是英国编剧写的，而且都写了六季了女王也没说啥。

无怪推特上的高赞转发是下议院议员的回怼：我们能不能警告观众，Boris Johnson在接受首相质询时说的很多话也是虚构的？

哦，最后要是说到治大国如烹小鲜……看到女王顿顿都吃水煮三文鱼，撒切尔欢迎儿子的至高礼遇是土豆泥……我就觉得也没理由说英国政治家们不乏味。

——他们就是很无趣，除了被编派成段子的时候。

因为故事背景都是撒切尔政府时期，所以《王冠》第四季跟《议事录》的互文简直太有趣了，刷完《王冠》又忍不住去把《议事录》重刷了一遍，果然撒切尔一家都被编派成了段子hhh千万搭配服用

本文部分刊于《北京青年报》

原文链接The fourth season of The Crown stretches from May 1979, when Margaret Thatcher is elected Britain’s first female prime minister, to Christmas 1990, shortly after she has been drummed out of office. Peter Morgan, the show’s creator, tells us: “We do our very, very best to get it right, but sometimes I have to conflate [incidents] . . . You sometimes have to forsake accuracy, but you must never forsake truth.” The forsaking of the truth, the perverting and twisting of known facts, is what has always concerned me throughout the four seasons of this series. It is about real people, often put into fictional situations.The main protagonists in season four are Thatcher and the Prince and Princess of Wales, clashed against some of the other characters from season three and earlier. This creates a new problem for anyone watching it since in both these relationships there are numerous contradictions, there has been much side-taking and it is possible to slant things in a variety of different ways. Nevertheless, even having taken that into consideration, there are established truths and untruths. My conclusion on this series is that it is yet more subtly divisive than earlier seasons. Pretty much every character is dislikeable. The Queen is portrayed as glum and schoolmistressly — quite unlike the real Queen. The Queen Mother is given some truly horrible lines; Princess Margaret is downright rude; Thatcher buttoned up. Diana is the heroine of this series, largely portrayed — in my view often unfairly — as the victim of a heartless family.Episode 1Did Lord Mountbatten write Prince Charles a letter urging him to settle down, on the day he set out for his ill-fated boating expedition at Mullaghmore?❌ FALSEThe Crown shows Lord Mountbatten on holiday at Classiebawn Castle, Co Sligo, on the morning of August 27, 1979, about to set off on a fishing trip with his daughter and other members of his family. He writes Prince Charles a letter urging him to find “some sweet and innocent, well-tempered girl with no past” to settle down with, and to do his duty. In reality, he wrote no such letter that day.He did, however, write to Prince Charles on many other occasions offering him advice, and many similar letters exist. Mountbatten was by no means a good influence. He urged Prince Charles to “sow his wild oats” before finding the unsullied girl. It’s true also that Charles held Mountbatten in high esteem. Mountbatten, it should be noted, was blown up at Mullaghmore by the IRA before Lady Diana Spencer came on the scene.Episode 2Do the Queen and the royal family lay secret protocol traps for hapless visitors to test them when they come and stay at Balmoral? Did they apply this to Thatcher?❌ FALSEThe Queen and the royal family go out of their way to make their guests feel at ease at Balmoral. In real life, Mr and Mrs Thatcher arrived at the castle on Saturday, September 8, 1979, a mere three days after Lord Mountbatten’s ceremonial funeral at Westminster Abbey. No hint of that in this episode of The Crown. It has to be 1979 because clearly they have never been before. But unlike what is shown in The Crown, there was no torturing of Thatcher, no maids being superciliously rude to her, no wrong-footing in silly games, no making her ill at ease for wearing the wrong clothes or shoes, and no, Thatcher did not plead pressure of work in London and leave early.In The Crown Diana too is invited to Balmoral to be checked out and succeeds and passes the tests, which Thatcher failed. Diana’s visit was, in fact, a year later, in 1980, and at a time when the Queen was not there.Was Thatcher berated by Princess Margaret for sitting in Queen Victoria’s chair at Balmoral — a chair in which no one must sit?✅ PARTLY TRUEA scene shows Thatcher retreating from a stalking expedition and working at a desk, where Princess Margaret strays across her. She berates her for sitting in Queen Victoria’s chair. It is true that there is a chair at Balmoral that no one should sit in — a winged armchair that was indeed Queen Victoria’s. It is in one of the drawing rooms, and about ten years ago the Queen had it moved to a place where people would not easily reach it. Queen Victoria was very tiny, so had Thatcher used it at her desk her chin would have been where her elbows should have been.Episode 3Was Thatcher out of place when staying at Balmoral?✅ TRUEThatcher was not particularly interested in country pursuits, but she went to Balmoral quite happily for the traditional stay by the prime minister in the late summer of each year. After the first Balmoral visit in 1979 her husband, Denis, wrote a letter, later quoted by their daughter, Carol: “There was a house party and some of the people who’d been shooting didn’t come in until later and then there were more drinks — because they’re very generous with drink — and then we went in for dinner. In their language it’s probably very informal but nevertheless you’re on tiptoe. There’s the usual sort of after-dinner conversation over coffee and then the Queen withdraws fairly early . . .”Did Prince Philip summon Prince Charles to the hanging room at Balmoral to command him to marry Diana?❌ FALSEThe Crown suggests that Prince Philip carpeted Prince Charles after the visit Diana supposedly made there in 1979. Presumably the film-makers chose the hanging room, where they skin the wildlife, to emphasise the idea of lambs to the slaughter. No, Prince Philip did not arrange such an encounter. The truth is that Diana began to be pursued by the press in the autumn of 1980, when the media got a hint that she might be Prince Charles’s future bride. She ran the gauntlet of photographers every time she left her flat in Coleherne Court, Earls Court.Aware of this, Prince Philip wrote to Prince Charles either late in 1980 or maybe early in 1981. Jonathan Dimbleby wrote in his authorised biography of “an intervention from the Duke of Edinburgh”, which had “a powerful if not a decisive impact”. The letter warned Prince Charles that he should decide one way or the other because he was risking damaging Diana’s reputation. Prince Charles interpreted this as “an ultimatum”, which was not the original intent. Thus, in a “confused and anxious state of mind”, the prince went ahead and proposed to Diana in early February 1981.Did Prince Charles really leave for Highgrove immediately after his engagement was announced, the presumption being that he would be seeing Camilla Parker Bowles, who lived near by?❌ FALSEThe Crown depicts those famous embarrassing lines by Prince Charles in the engagement interview at Buckingham Palace: “Whatever love means.” In real life Diana laughed nervously. In The Crown she looks cross. They have Prince Charles departing immediately afterwards for Highgrove, his Gloucestershire home, by implication to see Camilla. In fact, Charles and Diana dined with the Queen Mother at Clarence House that evening, which was also where Diana was staying.In this episode of The Crown, having seen Camilla, Charles then flies off — the very next day — on his official Antipodean tour. No. The engagement was announced on February 24, 1981. He flew to New Zealand on March 29, more than a month later, then on to Australia, Venezuela and the United States.Were the royal family beastly to Diana after her engagement, accusing her of not knowing to whom she should curtsey and making a clumsy entry into their midst?❌ FALSEWe see Diana arriving at Buckingham Palace and coming into a room filled with the royal family and bungling the curtseys. Princess Margaret tears a strip off her and they appear to mock her. This is spiteful rubbish. Diana had been brought up in the shadow of Sandringham, at Park House. Her two grandmothers and four great-aunts were in the Queen Mother’s household. Her father had been equerry to the Queen on the 1953-54 Commonwealth tour. She knew precisely what to do.Was Diana really clueless about royal protocol?❌ FALSEWe see Diana being instructed in many royal customs by her grandmother, Ruth, Lady Fermoy. Lady Fermoy is portrayed as a harridan. In real life she was much gentler (at least on the surface). Not only did Diana not need instruction in that way, but the nonsense the screen version Ruth Fermoy tells her granddaughter is risible. HRHs do not curtsey to each other. There is only one Page of the Backstairs etc.Diana did get advice about her new role from the four men in Prince Charles’s private office — Edward Adeane, Francis Cornish, Michael Colborne and Oliver Everett. Later in life she liked to claim that she was given no help.Was Diana cooped up in Buckingham Palace during the months before the wedding?✅ TRUEIn The Crown we see Diana dancing alone to her Walkman, rollerskating in the state rooms and confronted with trolley-loads of flowers and letters from the public. It’s here we first see her bulimia. As soon as she was engaged, the real Diana left her flat in Earls Court, first went to Clarence House, then moved to Buckingham Palace a few days later. She lived there for about five months until her marriage in July.The palace is more of a huge office/Edwardian hotel than a cosy home, and it is understandable that she felt gloomy there. The contrast to her life with her flatmates and this new life must have been sharp. One of the pages, working there at the time and looking after her, used to go out and buy her takeaways. So the loneliness and isolation portrayed in The Crown is accurate. It is also true that Diana did not see Prince Charles much before the wedding. She called him “Sir” until the day he proposed.Did Camilla Parker Bowles and Diana have lunch while Prince Charles was away in Australia?✅ TRUEThey did lunch together, according to one of Charles and Diana’s biographers, Sally Bedell Smith. Camilla wished to help her. However, Diana interpreted the motive for the lunch as being to establish that she would be mainly in London, leaving Highgrove and Gloucestershire and hunting as Camilla’s territory.All evidence suggests that whatever he may have wished, Prince Charles was perfectly aware that his relationship with Camilla had to stop when he got engaged, and that this was understood by all concerned. As Dimbleby put it: “Now that he was engaged to be married there was, and there would be, no other woman in his life.” Diana went into St Paul’s Cathedral for her wedding with her head down, and came out with her head up. She was now his wife, and genuinely hoped she could make him happy.Did Prince Charles give Camilla a special bracelet before his and Diana’s wedding?✅ TRUEIn The Crown we see Diana coming across the designs for a bracelet that the Prince of Wales intends to give his mistress shortly before the wedding. It is marked with the initials “F&G”, which Diana told her author, Andrew Morton, she thought stood for “Fred” and “Gladys” — Charles and Camilla’s pet names for each other.In reality, in the run-up to the wedding, the four private secretaries in Prince Charles’s private office became aware that Diana was preoccupied by suspicions concerning the prince’s relationship with Camilla. A bracelet was commissioned as a way of the prince saying goodbye. It had the initials “GF”, which stood for “Girl Friday”. Diana discovered the bracelet. She confronted Prince Charles and was not mollified. Nevertheless, he felt he should hand over the bracelet in person. The Dimbleby-authorised version is that this was the only time he saw Camilla between his engagement and the day of his wedding.Diana later told Morton that photos of Camilla spewed out of her husband’s wallet on their honeymoon. She believed that his relationship with Camilla never ceased. Clearly there were acute differences between the newlyweds right from the start of the marriage. On their honeymoon on Britannia, Diana chatted up the sailors and cooks, and he remained, as he wrote at the time, “hermit-like on the verandah deck, sunk with pure joy into one of Laurens van der Post’s books . . .”Episode 4Did Prince Charles call Camilla every day during the early years of his marriage to Diana?❌ FALSEPrince Charles had virtually no contact with Camilla at all for the first five years. Yet since Andrew Parker Bowles (the husband of Camilla) was commanding officer of the Household Cavalry Mounted Regiment from 1981 to 1983, then colonel commanding the Household Cavalry and Silver Stick from 1987 to 1990, there must have been a few formal encounters. Dimbleby dates the resumption of contact between them to 1986, by which time Charles’s marriage had, as he put it, “irretrievably broken down”.Did Mark Thatcher cause a national crisis when he got lost in the desert during a car race? Was he Thatcher’s favourite child?✅ TRUEThe Crown shows Mark Thatcher setting off in the Paris-Dakar car rally in January 1982. We see Thatcher in tears at her audience with the Queen telling her he has gone missing.This did happen. Mark Thatcher got stuck in the Sahara desert in Algeria for four days, and although he was not lost, nobody knew where he was. There were fears that he had been kidnapped. Thatcher was deeply upset and was seen in tears when the press asked her about the disappearance. President Mitterrand of France offered military support. Denis Thatcher was loaned a plane and after a 31-hour search young Mark was located. Denis was none too impressed with his son, not least for the casual response he made to the massive rescue operation.The Crown stresses that Mark was Thatcher’s favourite of her twins. This is confirmed by her daughter, Carol, in the biography she wrote about her father: “The rest of us could relax a little because Mark had hung an ‘occupied’ sign on the family’s ‘embarrassing relative’ slot.”Did Princess Anne resent the popularity of the Princess of Wales, and the lack of publicity she herself got in the media?❌ FALSEThis season implies that Princess Anne minded the easy publicity the Princess of Wales received just for wearing a new outfit, when she was a hard-working member of the royal family who got none. The truth is that Princess Anne did not care one iota about that. She never sought publicity or public approbation, a quality she shared with the Queen and Prince Philip. In fact, the arrival of Diana was liberating for Princess Anne. No longer was she meant to fulfil a role as a romantic, fairytale princess in the eyes of the media — she could be what she naturally was, a successful and highly executive princess.Episode 5How true was the depiction of Michael Fagan, the intruder who found his way into the Queen’s bedroom?✅ TRUEIt was a great shock to the nation to hear, in July 1982, that a man had twice scaled the walls of Buckingham Palace, and that on the second occasion security had been so lax that he had found his way into the Queen’s bedroom. Fortunately he had no malign intent, otherwise it could have been a great deal more serious.We don’t know the Queen’s version, but Fagan has described what happened, and The Crown’s events are close to a faithful representation of what happened — the two break-ins, him drinking the wine and later his confrontation with the Queen. Along with the June 1981 firing of blanks at the Queen in The Mall (an incident ignored by the makers of The Crown), this shows the Queen’s courage and adroit handling of what must have been a terrifying experience.Did Thatcher usurp the Queen’s position by taking the salute at the Falklands victory parade?✅ TRUEIn this episode Thatcher has an audience with the Queen telling her about the successful end of the Falklands conflict, then announces that she is off to attend the victory parade at Mansion House, where she, instead of the Queen, takes the salute. It did not happen exactly like that, of course.Stanley was taken back on June 14, 1982. The parade actually took place in London several months later, on October 12. However, Thatcher did attend, while the Queen did not, because she was on a tour of the South Pacific at the time. There were definitely hints in the media at the time that Thatcher was becoming presidential in her approach.Episode 6The Prince and Princess of Wales went on a tour of Australia and New Zealand in March 1983. Did Diana throw a tantrum and demand to change all the tour plans so as not to be separated from baby Prince William?❌ FALSEIt was a new idea for the Waleses to bring baby William with them on tour. Diana did not wish to be separated from her son, born the previous summer. But, no, the tour was not rearranged. In order that they could be with William, the outgoing Australian prime minister, Malcolm Fraser (who lost the election just before the visit), asked a well-known philanthropist, Gordon Darling, to lend them his sheep station, Woomargama, which was situated between Sydney and Melbourne and close to Canberra (by Australian standards). Albury airport was near by and they were able to fly everywhere, returning each night to be with the baby.They took about 27 flights during their visit. The Waleses stayed at Woomargama from March 20 to April 17 and they had an entourage of 23 British staff travelling with them, including a private chef. Those staff who stayed at Woomargama made a significant dent in Darling’s cellar.Did Prince Charles feel overshadowed by Diana on that trip?✅ PARTLY TRUEThis was one of the early examples of “Di-mania”, but since the Waleses were getting along well and the trip was considered a great success, the prince was more concerned as to how it would affect her. She was partly elated and partly exhausted. He wrote that she was a great support to him at times when he felt gloomy.There was certainly a part of him that did not like being upstaged by his wife. At this time his annoyance was matched by his pride in her, but it is true that later on he came to resent how people were only interested in her clothes, and thus did not listen to his speeches.Did Bob Hawke, the republican prime minister of Australia, refer to the Queen as “a pig in twin set and pearls in charge of a herd of prime beef cattle”?❌ FALSEIn The Crown Bob Hawke is portrayed as a rabid republican, hoping a visit by an out-of-touch and unremarkable Prince Charles would lead to the removal of the monarch as head of state of Australia. His plans are thwarted by the public’s thrall in Princess Diana.Yes, Hawke was an avowed republican, but there was no appetite for change to a republic in 1983. Hawke got on well with the Queen due to a shared interest in racing. He would never have referred to Prince Charles as a “jug-eared bonehead”, nor made jokes at a press conference: “You wouldn’t put a pig in charge of a herd of prime beef cattle — even if it did look good in a twin set and pearls.”Episode 7Did the Queen sideline Princess Margaret when Prince Edward came of age?❌ FALSEIn The Crown we see the Queen and her private secretary, Sir Martin Charteris, informing Princess Margaret that Prince Edward has come of age and she would no longer be eligible to serve as a Counsellor of State. To explain — six Counsellors of State are appointed to act on her behalf while the monarch is abroad (or incapacitated). Only two of them actually act — and they do so in tandem.While it is true that from March 1985 Princess Margaret could no longer be a Counsellor of State (which did disappoint her because she had enjoyed doing it), it made absolutely no difference to her other royal duties. This episode exaggerates this to imply that Princess Margaret’s role as a working member of the royal family had come to an end.Another point — Sir Martin retired in 1977 and became provost of Eton. But he stays on right through season four. By 1990 he would have been 77, but his actor does not age. He remains as youthful as ever — looking about 45.Were the Queen’s cousins put away in a state lunatic asylum to save the monarchy?❌ FALSEThis has no basis in truth. In this episode Princess Margaret visits a therapist due to her “sidelining” and is told of the existence of her two cousins shut away in Earlswood mental hospital. In real life she took no interest in them.Next they have the Queen Mother telling Princess Margaret that these girls had to be shut away because had it been known that they existed, it would have had serious consequences for the monarchy after the abdication. The implication is that the world may have feared that a strain of lunacy had entered the family.The reality was that these two girls and three cousins had inherited a defective gene from the Trefusis family from which all five descended through their mothers. Nerissa and Katherine were the daughters of Fenella Trefusis, who married the Queen Mother’s brother, Jock Bowes Lyon, so this had nothing to do with the Queen Mother’s bloodline.Episode 8Did Thatcher defy the Queen’s wishes for sanctions to be imposed on South Africa?✅ TRUEIn 1985 48 countries of the Commonwealth wanted to impose sanctions on South Africa, but Thatcher did not wish to do so. As head of the Commonwealth, the Queen was inclined to support the 48. In this episode they concentrate on the differences between the sovereign and the British prime minister. On this there were obvious differences.The Queen was dedicated to the Commonwealth, one of the most important missions of her reign. Thatcher was not keen on it, and preferred to focus on good relations with the United States. On this issue Thatcher saw no merit in sanctions, believing that they hardened opposition rather than reduced it. The episode ends with one of the explanatory captions they sometimes employ — Nelson Mandela ending apartheid and crediting sanctions with making that possible.Did the Queen wish the world to know that she thought Thatcher was “uncaring”, and was she therefore responsible for placing a story in The Sunday Times expressing this?❌ FALSEHere they paint the Queen’s press secretary, Michael Shea, as an honourable man who would never betray the Queen or in any way impugn her political impartiality. In this episode, set in July 1986, the Queen tells Shea that just for once she wants her views known. Therefore, unwillingly apparently, he talks to journalists and the story breaks in The Sunday Times with the (real) headline. “Queen Dismayed by ‘Uncaring’ Thatcher”. The ensuing furore is such that Sir Martin Charteris (who in real life had long retired, remember) sacrifices Shea, telling him to resign and take the blame because a scalp is needed to divert the media from the Queen.The reverse was the case. Shea took it upon himself to talk to The Sunday Times. He then denied that he had done so, and when finally forced to own up, stated that he had been misrepresented. The Palace got rid of him by securing him a job with Hanson plc. What Shea had done was to relay his personal dislike of Thatcher’s policies to the world.The story of Shea has been exposed by many distinguished authors, not least Charles Moore in his authorised biography of Margaret Thatcher.Episode 9Was Prince Charles irritated by Diana’s surprise dance with Wayne Sleep at Covent Garden in 1985, which she intended as his 37th birthday gift?✅ TRUEThere was a private gala at Covent Garden in December 1985 (for some reason they say November, and no it wasn’t for his birthday) and at a certain point Diana slipped away and suddenly appeared on stage with Wayne Sleep and danced to Billy Joel’s Uptown Girl. This was meant to be a gift to her husband, but he took it amiss (an incident omitted from Dimbleby’s authorised biography). Sleep got the impression that Prince Charles was somewhat put out, instead of touched. In this episode Charles berates Diana with some ferocity.Did the tragic avalanche in Klosters in 1988 in which Hugh Lindsay was killed impact on the Waleses’ marriage to the point that Charles decided that he had to get out of it while Diana was determined that it should continue?❌ FALSEOn a holiday in Klosters, Prince Charles, Hugh Lindsay (an equerry to the Queen and his friend), a respected guide and Patty Palmer-Tomkinson went skiing off-piste. They encountered an avalanche in which Major Lindsay lost his life. According to this episode, the tragedy inspires Prince Charles to the conclusion that he wants to get out of his marriage and unite with Camilla, even though she is still married. Meanwhile, Diana declares that Charles’s near death makes her realise how much she would have missed him, so she declares that she wants to make it work.There is mention of the affair she had with James Hewitt and they suggest that she has dropped him. In fact, it wasn’t until 1992 that Prince Charles considered separation. And in real life the Princess of Wales blamed Prince Charles for this accident by taking Lindsay off-piste. She refused ever to return to Klosters and was dismayed that he did.Were Charles and Camilla meeting regularly at Highgrove by 1988?✅ TRUEAccording to the evidence, Charles and Camilla were seeing each other again by 1986. This series takes the Diana line that Charles and Camilla were in touch all the way through the marriage. Viewers should be cautious to accept this without question. They will see an angry Prince Charles, sometimes yelling at his wife, aggressive and demeaning to her. What is largely omitted is any account of Diana’s well-documented distressing behaviour, including tantrums and insecurities. The Crown clearly presents a one-sided portrait of the marriage.Were there several meetings between the Queen and the Waleses to discuss the crumbling marriage?❌ FALSEVarious meetings are shown in which the Queen discusses the predicament in which the Waleses found themselves and tells them to pull themselves together. In reality these did not take place. Until Prince Charles realised that Diana had been directly involved in the publication of Morton’s book, Diana – Her True Story, in the summer of 1992, he maintained a façade, and the hope that there was a way for the marriage to continue in some way or another.The Dimbleby line on this was that the royal family were aware of “the princess’s distress”, but did not wish to interfere. So there was no summit meeting with the Queen, Prince Philip and the Waleses until June 1992.Episode 10Did Thatcher try to get the Queen to dissolve parliament to save her skin at the time of the leadership crisis in 1990?❌ FALSEOf course Thatcher did no such thing. It is well known that when Geoffrey Howe resigned and delivered his devastating resignation piece (faithfully shown by The Crown), Thatcher faced a challenge to her leadership from Michael Heseltine. The outfall for that is well shown — the meetings with ministers, her gradual realisation that she must go, but then they introduce this nonsense.In The Crown they have her telling Denis that she has one card up her sleeve. So she goes to see the Queen and asks her to dissolve parliament and therefore call a general election. Theoretically she could have done that, and technically the Queen could refuse. But it never happened, nor would it have done.Was the Queen angry when Thatcher was ousted by her ministers in 1990?✅ TRUEThere is a genuinely moving scene in The Crown in which the Queen summons Thatcher to see her, and she presents her with the Order of Merit. I remember being told at the time that the Queen was not pleased by the way they got rid of Thatcher. So the line “I was shocked by the way in which you were forced to leave office” is spot-on. People have persisted in thinking the Queen and Thatcher did not get on. The Order of Merit is in her personal gift, as is clearly explained here, and her gift of it is evidence of her respect for her first female prime minister. Thatcher was surprised and delighted to be offered it.If further evidence is required, the Queen appointed her a Lady Companion of the Order of the Garter in 1995 — again her personal gift. She attended her 70th and 80th birthday parties and was present at her funeral in St Paul’s Cathedral in 2013. The only other prime minister whose funeral the Queen has attended was that of Sir Winston Churchill in 1965.Did Prince Philip try to comfort Diana during a miserable Christmas at Sandringham, then threaten her that it “wouldn’t end well” if she left her marriage?❌ FALSEIt is true that by 1990 Sandringham Christmases were something of a strain for Diana, but she was there to be with her boys. In this episode Prince Philip visits her in her room for a comforting conversation. She tells him that if Prince Charles and the royal family can’t give her the love and security she deserves, then she will have no option but to break away officially. He advises her not to with the ominous words: “Let’s just say — I can’t see it ending well for you.” To which she responds: “I hope that isn’t a threat, sir.”In truth, the real Prince Philip did intervene to help Diana, but not until the summer of 1992, when the royal marriage became a crisis after Morton’s book. There was an exchange of letters between them. He did everything he could to find a way to keep the marriage intact. There was not a hint of a threat in any of them (I have read them).The Queen is shown in several episodes in a magnificent uniform for various Birthday Parades (Trooping the Colour). Did they get that right?❌ FALSEIn the opening sequence of The Crown the Queen is shown in the uniform of colonel-in-chief, Grenadier Guards — a grenade on the collar, a white plume in her cap and buttons in ones. She wears the Garter riband and star. It pops up in several episodes.The first trooping portrayed was June 1979, when it was the colour of the Scots Guards being trooped, so they have dressed her in the wrong uniform — it should have been a thistle on the collar, no plume, and buttons in threes. When the Scots Guards colour is trooped, she wears the dark green riband and star of the Thistle. At the 1979 trooping Prince Philip also wore the green Thistle riband. In The Crown he wears the Garter.At the 1982 trooping the Queen is shown riding along as a grenadier again, so a grenade on the collar, and buttons in ones. But this time they give her the plume of the Welsh Guards (white/green/white). It should have been a Coldstream Guards uniform, a Garter star on the collar, a red plume and buttons in twos. With their massive budget and their various advisers, the film-makers could so easily have tweaked these and got them right.In real life the Queen had five separate Guards uniforms, one for each of the five regiments of which she was colonel-in-chief — Grenadier, Coldstream, Scots, Irish and Welsh (in that order).

以下都是个人的看法，欢迎来喷第四季的一大焦点无疑是如何处理戴安娜王妃事件，我觉得编剧处理的很好，甚至有些偏戴安娜王妃。

即便戴安娜过世已经这么久了，我还是会称呼她为戴安娜王妃。

记得戴安娜王妃过世时，我还在上小学。

并不清楚她是谁，当时的英语老师是个狄更斯迷，也算是个英国通吧，当然比还是小孩子的我们要通很多。

记得有两周的英语课都在讲戴安娜王妃的生平，为其鸣不平。

其善良，魅力，优雅深深植入人心了。

当时各种阴谋论，渣男论甚嚣尘上，几乎成了主流。

当二十来年后，看到这一季，也因为生活的历练，有了一番对戴安娜王妃的际遇翻天覆地的看法。

要先说造成戴安娜王妃不幸结局的，我觉得主要是女王，舆论，查尔斯和戴安娜王妃自己。

影响占比也是女王<舆论<查尔斯<戴安娜王妃先说说女王，女王陛下估计是，把当下所有国家元首政客都算上，最值得尊重的人了。

其中有很冷血的一幕，就是澳洲之行后戴安娜王妃找女王哭诉查尔斯对自己的不忠甚至侮辱。

而女王的反应是，是不是你戴安娜有些逾制了，请允许我使用这个词。

这让我联想到上一季，女王平息蒙巴顿勋爵政变时，当面对勋爵勋爵的问题，“如果我的国家正在被政府往错误的道路上带，我们还能视而不理么”，女王的回答，堪称最大的政治智慧，“我们王室能做的就是什么都不做，等选举它的人民再把它选下去”。

让人想到先秦时代的老庄政治哲学，相比以无为求有为的老子思想，无疑女王的思想更趋近以无为求无为的庄子。

这就导致女王几乎在public事物上几乎不能有任何表态，同时女王也是一个有情绪障碍人格的人，作为一个人格统一的人，无疑对内对外的事物上的态度上都要保持相对一致。

作为人，在对人对事上不可能没有偏重，如果想一碗水端平，那就是在不触犯原则的情况下，啥都不做，少做少错，不做不错。

有一幕女王和爱丁堡公爵谈论谁是自己最爱的孩子，女王竟然想不出谁是自己最喜欢的孩子，可见无为的意识已经深入血液了。

这也导致女王认为在戴安娜王妃的事情上，没有做任何干涉，认为其应该站好自己的位置，承担自己的责任插一嘴，如果你是个有过多年婚姻经历的人，你应该会感触良多。

爱丁堡公爵和女王对婚姻的处理，堪称教科书式的，松弛有度，女王也是以无为的方式处理的，有机会可以展开来说。

所以说由于女王的伟大，什么都不做无疑给了无助的戴安娜王妃很大的打击。

再说说舆论上，当时可以说一边倒的支持戴安娜王妃，可是这与宫廷的规矩和运作是格格不入的。

可以说舆论越支持，可能越导致戴安娜王妃最终的不行，因为当时的舆论力量不比今天，还不足以完全影响宫廷的运转的制度。

作用力越大反作用力就越大，就越使戴安娜王妃远离王室。

再说说当事人之一，查尔斯吧当我看到成年查尔斯的演员时，我觉得，这个剧选角简直绝了，那种优柔寡断，多愁善感，脆弱，没勇气，智慧善良，都从演员的脸上展现出来了，几乎不用演。

如果倒回20年，最适合演查尔斯的，我觉得，可能就是老友记里的Ross了，哈哈

碰巧ross也是一生只爱一个这选角堪比马景涛饰演张无忌。

查尔斯是个渣男么？

我觉得不完全算，只能算是个优柔寡断，拎不清的人。

一生只喜欢卡米拉，说实话，到现在我都没法理解卡米拉哪儿优秀。

哈哈，可能这就是爱吧。

但限于王室的规矩，只能造就几个家庭的不幸。

就是因为他的软弱。

其实有时候，处理关系问题可能比处理国家事物更棘手。

我是觉得剧集中，应该是比较偏袒戴安娜王妃了，这也无可厚非。

毕竟死者为大，不幸的婚姻，双方都是有责任的，而且他们的结合不仅仅是为了婚姻。

最后说说戴安娜王妃，我觉得可以类比一下爱丁堡公爵，年轻时的菲利普也曾苦恼，挣扎。

埋怨自己的婚姻，自己的妻子，女王不能像对待丈夫般的对待自己。

但最后公爵明白了，也许是屈服了，认清了自己的位置，你的工作就是保护女王。

戴安娜王妃也有类似的问题，但不同的是，相比她的公公婆婆，戴安娜王妃相较之下，比查尔斯强势太多了，政治能力也强太多了，这和容易造成“逾制”的危机。

她们既是夫妇，也是君臣。

我记得女王在他们成婚前的一大担忧就是，“她太年轻了”。

年轻的不足以handle自己的位置，即使聪明如戴安娜王妃。

但另一面，她无能的丈夫似乎很能拎的清自己的位置。

为什么说戴安娜王妃自己有最大的责任造成自己的不幸？

有句老话，“道儿都是自己走的”。

活在王室，不可能你既享有荣誉和资源，还能向往自由，追求人性的美好。

正应了我最喜欢的政治人物之一，撒切尔夫人说的，“他们既不高雅，也不高贵”。

翻译成人话就是，王室就不是人能呆的，完全是一群妖怪。

其实自打戴安娜王妃走进王宫那一天，就注定了悲剧。

其实这一季的情节大家都很熟悉，毕竟离我们很近，历史课角度其实能学的不多。

我反而对这几位大人物处理家庭，儿女事物的情节，台词设计，演员表演都特别考究，真实。

再大的人物，处理家务事时也是满头的问好，没有什么神秘的。

还有就是姑娘们想要幸福的生活，尽量远离所谓上流社会，真不是人呆的，哈哈😄

第一集 20231230算一个引子，但没认真看ಠ_ಠ第二集20240102撒切尔和戴安娜接受了考验。

前者没通过甚至提前退出，她发现了不同然后选择坚持自己；后者完美通过了考验但是也由此为之后的悲剧拉开序幕。

两个考验的对比很有意思。

王室成员不经意流露出来的傲慢。

不同阶级之间的不相容。

女王和撒切尔对于“血腥运动”的交锋很精彩。

第三集20240102不知道事实如何，但剧里的查尔斯对于和戴安娜结婚的抗拒还是挺明显的。

戴安娜最开始肯定以为是真的找到爱情了（对应fairytale），但在那六周发觉了不对。

可是在她周围的所有人都与她是不同的立场。

王室内的人认为维护王室地位和稳定更重要，也认为他们婚后可以日久生情。

玛格丽特公主一如既往敏锐。

甜品看得很饿。

第四集20240102由撒切尔夫人儿子失踪引出的女王对谁是自己最爱的孩子的思考。

她分别秘密见了每个孩子，并在之前要求秘书罗列每个人的好恶，免得自己显得冷漠。

女王受到这样的困扰也能反映出她在所有方面都扮演一个极度中立的人的角色，当然有时候这样的角色显得很冷漠无情。

第五集20240102等待王室接见的人和领救助金的人有鲜明的对比。

王室认为被接见的就是最普通正常的英国民众（normal people），但费根持相反意见。

费根在绝望之下，想做就做并且成功了。

让我想起在逛面包店时会冒出的一些疯狂的画面：一下子把面包全出来然后走人……这集的三段对话很精彩，分别是费根和议员和女王，以及撒切尔夫人和女王。

又看到一些女王的难处，比如作为虚位君主，她没有办法对费根的请求做出任何有效回应，同时作为女王，她在外人面前时刻保持完美的体面和礼貌，参考费根被警察带出去并且和女仆对话的戏份（演员演得太好了）。

第六集20240103主要是戴安娜和查尔斯之间的冲突和对抗。

开头女王说1954年的出访他们把孩子留在家六个星期也完全没事（这里给了安妮一个镜头）和戴安娜坚持要把威廉带上有一种很强烈的对比。

女王对于女王职责更为看重，而戴安娜更看重自己母亲和妻子的身份（在后面也多次强调）。

于是拍她坚持带上孩子真是让人觉得...啊真麻烦啊...查尔斯依旧是打电话给卡米拉抱怨。

没仔细研究过他们的情史，但电视剧真是让人觉得他们三个人走向这样的结局，因果非常的顺畅。

中段夫妻俩突然说开了，开始甜蜜地出访之旅。

但由于戴安娜太受欢迎了，又出现了新问题：查尔斯觉得自己才应该是主角，但现在这个风头完全被戴安娜抢走了。

这在这集里也多次强调了，查尔斯渴望得到认可、关注和感谢（具体是哪三点有点记不清），因为他从小缺乏。

于是俩人关系又开始走向破裂。

出访回来下机后，他们坐上不同的车，报了不同的目的地，车开向相反的两个方向。

戴安娜去找女王控诉查尔斯，并且希望女王能在各方面给予她支持。

戴安娜大大拥抱了女王，结果把女王吓到了。

这样在情感上相对比较冷漠的女王可能确实是很适合女王这个位置，但在家庭角色上可能就显得不那么完美（感觉对应了第四集favorite）。

王太后认为戴安娜需要时间去改变，最后由依旧一针见血的玛格丽特公主做结论：如果她不改（bend），她就会破碎（break）。

从事后诸葛的角度看，也还是觉得一惊。

怎么总给玛格丽特公主安排这么精辟的发言。

第七集玛格丽特公主是主角。

因为无意间发现的遗传病而对自己家族产生的怀疑。

越发觉得剧里玛格丽特公主是编剧的批判王室的代言人。

第八集 48:1女王和首相的斗争。

撒切尔夫人为什么总是歪着的。

第九集从雪崩开篇，查尔斯认识到自己真的很想和戴安娜离婚，戴安娜意识到自己真的很不想离婚。

各种矛盾继续累积。

只能说各方面都不和的人生活在一起确实挺煎熬。

不过王室为了体面不会赞成离婚。

这加剧了不和。

雪崩里的雪花又多了。

戴安娜的补救于事无补。

冷暴力下她再次出轨。

这一段拍得好不错。

查尔斯是婚姻里权力大的一方，这么看的话戴安娜很可怜。

第十集 war 20240115撒切尔的战争，戴安娜的战争。

算是给两人定了结局。

快乐的圣诞节，戴安娜只有泪水。

啊好可怜。

第一集 Gold Stick 黄金护杖关键词：北爱尔兰，撒切尔夫人，蒙巴顿爵士这一集开场背景是北爱冲突不断。

1801年以前，爱尔兰由一个由新教徒支配的爱尔兰议会统治，这个议会拥有相当大的自治权，但新教徒在爱尔兰属少数人。

1801年爱尔兰议会被解散，爱尔兰成为大不列颠及爱尔兰联合王国的一部分。

1846年到1849年的马铃薯产量很低造成了一场大饥荒，许多人饿死，更多的人背井离乡。

爱尔兰的人口从850万减少到600万。

英国政府袖手旁观。

因此从19世纪下半叶开始爱尔兰的独立运动又抬头了。

电视剧《维多利亚》第二季有一集就专门讲爱尔兰饥荒。

在政治和武力斗争后，1921年，爱尔兰岛南部的26个郡从英国独立，爱尔兰共和国成立，北部的其它郡依然是联合王国的一部分。

北爱尔兰问题（The Troubles）简称为北爱问题，是指由1968年至1998年在北爱尔兰的长期暴力活动，该冲突在由英国和爱尔兰政府于1998年4月10日签订北爱和平协议后中止。

北爱尔兰的天主教徒和新教徒之间的争执至今未能彻底解决。

喜剧《德里女孩》的背景就是设定在90年代的北爱。

北爱冲突上一季第八集，1970年，爱德华希思(Edward Heath)成为首相，可惜在他任内的“血腥星期日(Bloody Sunday)”没有出现在剧情中。

1972年1月30日，北爱尔兰民权协会组织了一次反对英国在北爱尔兰进行的不经审判就进行关押的收容制度的游行。

当时英军司令部接到了有一个爱尔兰共和军的狙击手在附近活动的报告。

英军下令使用实弹射击。

最终英军向正在游行的市民开枪。

流血星期日是北爱尔兰命运的一个主要负面转折点。

爱德华希思这一集近结尾时在葬礼上，借爱尔兰广播对“血腥星期日”有提到一句。

1972年，北爱尔兰德里地区(Derry)，英国伞兵向正在游行的市民开枪，造成14人(剧中说的是13人)死亡。

查尔斯在蒙巴顿葬礼上讲话关于北爱冲突参考电影：《血腥星期日》，《风吹麦浪》和《饥饿》。

1972年，北爱人民因不满英国政府未经审讯便予以拘留的不人道做法，决定在1月30日这天举行一场游行。

英国陆军发表声明，定义这是一次非法游行，并将进行镇压。

1976年，哈罗德·威尔逊(Harold Wilson)因病辞职后，工党詹姆斯·卡拉汉(James Callaghan)成为首相。

1979年，保守党(Consevative Party)玛格丽特·撒切尔(Margaret Thatcher)赢得大选，后又赢得两次大选成为近代任期最长的首相，任期长达11年。

王室进行检阅撒切尔夫人(1925-2013)会见女王(1926-)，随后王室一家人前往苏格兰度假。

玛格丽特·希尔达·撒切尔，婚前姓罗伯茨（Roberts），1979年至1990年为英国首相，1975年至1990年为保守党党魁，是英国第一位女首相，亦是20世纪英国连任时间最长的首相。

撒切尔曾被一位苏联记者描述为“铁娘子”。

撒切尔原于牛津大学萨默维尔学院从事化学研究，后于伦敦大学城市学院属下的城市法学院修读法律而成为一位大律师。

她的父亲阿尔弗瑞德·罗伯茨（Alfred Roberts）在当地镇上经营杂货店，而且热心于地方政治。

他除了是地方议会的议员，并曾在1945-1946年任格兰瑟姆市长。

撒切尔夫人扮演者就是《Sex Education》男主母亲通过菲利普(1921-)和安妮公主(1950-)的谈话得知，安妮已经结婚，还是个奥林匹克选手。

安妮公主擅长马术，1971年，21岁的安妮公主便获得了欧洲全能马术锦标赛三项赛的个人冠军，并且当选为英国广播公司（BBC）年度最佳体育人物。

四年后，她再次取得欧洲全能马术锦标赛三项赛的个人亚军和团队亚军。

次年，她参加了1976年蒙特利尔奥运会，成为英国代表队中的一员，也是英国王室参加奥运的第一人。

在1976年的蒙特利尔奥运会上，骑手必须接受性别检查，但是安妮公主的名气太大了，蒙特利尔奥运会的官员决定不再对安妮公主进行性别检查，这也创造了奥运会的历史。

（来源：百度百科）

安妮公主1973，安妮公主下嫁马克·菲利浦斯(Mark Phillips)，两人相识于马术活动，育有一子一女，1989年分居，1992年离婚。

剧中有个短暂的镜头，他们两口子在车中争吵。

马克·菲利普斯是伦敦西敏寺教堂女王的第1近卫龙骑兵(1st The Queen's Dragon Guards)中的一名中尉，后升为上尉。

按照惯例，女王在马克·菲利普斯婚期授于他一个伯爵爵位，但被他拒绝。

婚礼结束后，安妮公主和马克·菲利普斯上尉住在格洛斯特郡盖特康比公园(Gatcombe Park)。

他们的儿子彼得·菲利浦斯出生于1977年，但并不具有任何皇家头衔，因为安妮和丈夫拒绝了让他生为贵族的建议。

（来源：百度百科）

安妮与丈夫这一集个人心中最大亮点是戴安娜(1961-1997)终于登场，虽然是短暂几个镜头，出场还身着莎士比亚剧的戏服，当时查尔斯王子是前来见她的姐姐萨拉·斯宾塞。

戴安娜扮《仲夏夜之梦》the Mad Tree查尔斯王子(1948-)一直私会已为人妻的卡米拉(1947-)，这引得其honorary grandpa蒙巴顿爵士的劝诫。

查尔斯与蒙巴顿通话1979年8月，路易·蒙巴顿(Louis Mountbatten)被刺杀身亡，享年79岁，一名爱尔兰共和军(IRA, Irish Republican Army)成员先前在其船上绑了炸弹。

船只爆炸随船的双胞胎外孙之一和一个爱尔兰少年船员一同遇难，蒙巴顿长女帕特里夏和丈夫的两腿都被炸断，但两人均存活。

蒙巴顿和家人，其实只有双胞胎之一在船上蒙巴顿将军一直被王室成员喊作Dickie，曾试图搞军事政变推翻威尔逊政府(S3E05 Coup)。

爱丽丝公主蒙巴顿的长姐爱丽丝是菲利普的母亲(S3E04这一集有专门讲爱丽丝公主)，在菲利普的心中一直是以父亲的形象，后和查尔斯王子更为亲近，果真是隔代亲。

菲利普表示有点小嫉妒蒙巴顿的父亲是一个德国王子，母亲是维多利亚公主，其是维多利亚女王二女儿爱丽丝公主的长女，也就是说蒙巴顿的外外祖母是维多利亚女王。

蒙巴顿伯爵刺杀蒙巴顿同日，IRA还对在北爱尔兰唐郡沃伦点行军的英国陆军发动袭击，共18名英军士兵丧生，称作沃伦点(Warrenpoint)袭击。

撒切尔夫人就此向IRA宣战。

撒切尔和女王通话1981年，一批IRA囚犯在北爱一监狱(Maze Prison)举行绝食，撒切尔夫人持强硬立场，坚拒恢复该批囚犯的政治犯待遇，并指“罪行就是罪行，无关政治(Crime is crime; it is not political)“，这句话被改编运用到撒切尔夫人和女王的电话中。

撒切尔夫人决定向IRA宣战第二集 The Balmoral Test 巴尔莫勒尔测试开场镜头是鹿，编剧皮特·摩根(Peter Mogan)太爱用“鹿”作为意象，早在2006年的电影《女王》中就用到了被射伤的鹿来代表代表衰落的王室。

《女王》简介：1997年，戴安娜王妃车祸身亡，举国悲痛欲绝，但是英国王室人员却对此采取了逃避疏离的态度。

这种漠不关心激怒了很多英国民众。

民众反王室的情绪相当高涨，紧急形势让王室陷入了严重的危机。

雄鹿戴安娜在外祖母(Lady Fermoy)的陪同下和查尔斯一同看威尔第(Verdi)歌剧《茶花女》。

观看歌剧戴安娜看到的是浪漫，查尔斯反而强调其传承和zz影响(legacy and political influence)，通过其二人在艺术品审美或视角不同，已初现二人的差异。

《茶花女》(La traviata，英文意思：the fallen woman)是由朱塞佩·威尔第作曲的三幕歌剧，改编自法国文学家小仲马于1848年出版的小说《茶花女》(The Lady of the Camellias，La dame aux Camélias)。

歌剧《茶花女》是在讲述一个女子的悲剧，展现上流社会的虚伪(La Traviata, Verdi’s tragic tale of a young woman’s self-sacrifice and the hypocrisy of upper-class society)，很妙的暗喻了。

朱塞佩·威尔第（Giuseppe Verdi，1813年—1901年），意大利作曲家。

代表歌剧：《弄臣》《茶花女》《奥赛罗》

二人对歌剧的见解十分不同撒切尔采取激进的经济改革，进行大幅度的支出削减，直接引起内阁不满，因为这会也的确导致失业率大幅上升。

撒切尔的评价在英国社会中十分之两极化，有些人赞扬她的改革挽救了英国，并成功使英国摆脱1970年代以来的经济困境。

可是同时有人认为，她削弱了英国作为福利国家的地位，以及打压本土制造业，使上百万人长期失业。

撒切尔要削减40亿英镑的开支，严格限制zf部门开支撒切尔和丈夫丹尼斯·撒切尔前往苏格兰巴尔莫勒尔城堡，和王室成员一同度假，女王会举行一系列活动来看这名客人是否能被王室成员接纳或喜爱，此测试被称为巴尔莫勒尔测试(The Balmoral Test)。

撒切尔夫人1951年与丈夫丹尼斯·撒切尔爵士结婚，两夫妇的婚姻长达52年，丹尼斯在2003年逝世。

丹尼斯·撒切尔平民出身的撒切尔讲究务实勤干，和有着繁文缛节喜爱骑马打猎的王室格格不入，测试并未通过。

女王一开始开帮着说话，之后也一脸嫌弃了由于其货币主义政策，她的经验也受到内阁和民众质疑。

撒切尔遭到质疑撒切尔夫人直接清洗内阁，和女王再次会面时，双方都开始暗戳戳讽刺对方。

撒切尔的to-do list女王说有的客人只能看猎杀动物的残忍血腥，不懂背后的仁慈和必要；撒切尔说裁掉的大臣都是privileged和entilement（这不就是在说贵族嘛），所以他们都缺乏毅力。

直接开讽戴安娜不仅通过了测试，更是大获全胜获得了全员的喜爱。

1961年，戴安娜·弗朗西斯·斯宾塞出生于英格兰东部。

1967年，戴安娜的父母婚姻因她母亲不忠而破裂，戴安娜及她的姐弟的抚养权归她父亲所有。

1975年，她的祖父斯宾塞伯爵七世去世，她的父亲约翰·斯宾塞成为斯宾塞伯爵八世(Earl Spencer)，戴安娜一家从诺福克郡的家搬到Althorp的家族大宅，戴安娜成为戴安娜·斯宾塞女爵(Lady Diana Spencer)。

（来源：维基百科）

王室一家对戴安娜都是一脸满意《王冠》第二季影评：《王冠》背后，分集剧情介绍《王冠》第三季影评：《王冠》第三季分集个人笔记《王冠》第四季影评：《王冠》第四季分集简介-第3集世纪婚礼《王冠》第四季分集简介-第4-5集马岛战争《王冠》第四季分集简介-第6-8集《王冠》第四季分集简介-第9-10集《王冠》第五季预测：《王冠》第五季剧情预测同类影视推荐：不列颠历代英国君主影视作品

我不想给查尔斯和卡米拉的关系做一些人性的、冠冕堂皇的解释。

是的我可以理解你们遭遇了并不完整并不快乐的童年成长和爱情，你们的出身和教育局限了你们的命运，但是无论如何，你们都不该把自己的幸福建立在伤害另一个人的前提下，用这种卑鄙无耻的手段争取到的幸福，也怪不得你们两个永远都抬不上排面。

我非常讨厌卡米拉，倒不是因为我有多喜欢黛安娜，我只是无比厌恶这种在道德和底线的边缘试探人性的女人。

你的人生已经稀巴烂了，你就要拉着别人的人生陪葬，无论你是为了什么，野心还是有趣。

这种人不配做王妃，甚至连一个善良的人都不配做。

除了一个怂蛋和活着，也不知道你费尽心思的从那里赢得了什么。